segunda-feira, maio 18, 2026
HomeAltcoinWas NYC Token a Rug Pull? Nansen Analysts Identify 4 Red Flags

Was NYC Token a Rug Pull? Nansen Analysts Identify 4 Red Flags



Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams’ NYC meme coin has drawn heavy criticism from the crypto neighborhood after plunging greater than 80%, pushing its market capitalization under $100 million.

While each Adams and the undertaking’s staff deny any wrongdoing, uncommon liquidity actions raised crimson flags, prompting some analysts to characterize the token as a potential rug pull. In an unique interview with BeInCrypto, a Nansen analyst outlined 4 the reason why NYC token seems to suit the broader definition of “rug pulls.”

Sponsored

Around 60% of Traders Suffer Losses Following NYC Token Meltdown

Earlier this week, BeInCrypto reported that Adams revealed the token at Times Square. It surged shortly after its launch, however the rally was unsustainable.

“FORMER NYC MAYOR JUST RUGPULLED. The coin immediately hit $500 million in the market cap before Eric withdrew liquidity from the coin. This caused a massive 80% crash, and the token went below $100 million,” Ash Crypto posted.

Blockchain analysts identified unusual liquidity conduct. Rune Crypto alleged that Adams eliminated $3.4 million from the token’s liquidity pool. Bubblemaps additionally recognized suspicious liquidity exercise.

In a separate post, Bubblemaps highlighted the fallout from the NYC token. Around 4,300 merchants interacted with the NYC token, with roughly 60% recording losses.

  • 2,300 merchants misplaced lower than $1,000.
  • 200 merchants incurred losses starting from $1,000 to $10,000.
  • 40 merchants misplaced between $10,000 and $100,000.
  • 15 merchants incurred losses exceeding $100,000.

Sponsored

Was NYC Token Rug Pulled?

Nicolai Sondergaard, Research Analyst at Nansen, advised BeInCrypto that the explanation the NYC token may be grouped with other rug pulls is because of how liquidity was eliminated. The analyst outlined 4 key causes:

  • The staff didn’t make a prior announcement relating to a deliberate liquidity “rebalance.”
  • A considerable amount of liquidity was eliminated in a very quick interval relatively than steadily.
  • The liquidity that was withdrawn was not totally added again.
  • Liquidity was eliminated solely after the token had already reached excessive ranges.

(*4*) Sondergaard remarked.

Sponsored

He defined that eradicating liquidity, even partially, considerably will increase the affect of a single promote order. A promote order that may not have considerably affected the worth beneath regular liquidity circumstances can immediately transfer the market way more, usually triggering panic, cascades of sell-offs, and even forcing merchants with restrict orders out of their positions.

“What they did effectively trapped traders, forcing many to sell at a loss in a lower liquidity environment, and adding liquidity back in does not undo the damage done. Neither does setting up DCA orders undo the damages, but rather, it’s a bandaid solution,” the analyst stated.

Sondergaard emphasised that, from a market integrity standpoint, clear and clear communication around liquidity is essential. Why? Because merchants can not precisely assess threat if liquidity can disappear with out warning.

He talked about that incidents like this undermine belief throughout the broader ecosystem. The analyst added that higher transparency requirements, mixed with analytics-driven oversight, might assist distinguish legit initiatives from dangerous actors. Sondergaard recommended that,

“It’d be prudent for investors to in any case exercise caution whenever they trade memecoins. It is always worthwhile to look at holder distributions, does it seem like buy volume heavily outweighs sell volume, was one-sided liquidity provided (e.g., only in the token or was usdc also added?”

Sponsored

Adams Denies Rug Pull Allegations 

Amid this backlash, the former mayor’s spokesperson, Todd Shapiro, shared a assertion, pushing again towards the claims. He denied reviews that Adams moved investor funds or profited from the NYC token’s launch, stating the allegations are false and unsupported by proof. 

The spokesperson famous that NYC Token skilled worth volatility typical of newly launched digital property. He reiterated Adams’ commitment to transparency, accountability, and accountable innovation.

Previously, the NYC Token staff attributed the liquidity actions to a rebalancing course of following sturdy demand at launch.



Source link

Related articles

Latest posts