Dragonfly managing accomplice Haseeb Qureshi has sharpened his protection of Ethereum’s valuation, arguing that critics are utilizing the incorrect monetary framework and that ETH needs to be analyzed extra like an early-stage Amazon than a mature “value” inventory.
Speaking on the Milk Road Show on 9 December 2025, Qureshi revisited his now-viral valuation conflict with investor Santiago “Santi” Santos, hosted by ThreadGuy, which reignited the controversy over the right way to worth layer 1 blockchains. At the core of Qureshi’s thesis is an easy however controversial declare: charge income on Ethereum is successfully pure margin and needs to be handled as revenue, not as “revenue” within the conventional company sense.
“Blockchains don’t have revenue. They have profit,” he stated. “When chains charge fees, that’s profit. There’s no expenses for a chain. Chains don’t pay expenses, right? There’s no AWS hosting cost for Ethereum.”
Qureshi Pushes Back On Claims Ethereum Is Overvalued
Santos had argued that Ethereum is buying and selling at “300 plus” instances gross sales, calling these price-to-sales (P/S) ranges “embarrassing” relative to conventional firms and suggesting valuations are “way ahead of their skis.” Qureshi didn’t contest the magnitude of the multiples however rejected P/S as the appropriate lens.
Related Reading
“He was insisting in the debate that the right way to look at these things is price of sales. So if you look at price sales for Ethereum, it’s something like 380. If you look at Amazon, I think Amazon topped out at price of sales of 42. And this was during the bubble,” Qureshi stated.
He countered that for a blockchain, what fairness traders would name “sales” is nearer to the GDP or GMV of the on-chain economic system, which isn’t immediately measured on the protocol degree. The solely clear, observable line is charge earnings, which he treats as web earnings.
“The sales in some sense is like the GDP of the blockchain which we’re not measuring,” he argued. “The right thing to understand for a chain is the profit… The right thing to understand is what is the profit of Ethereum relative to the profit of Amazon.”
That opens the door to the Amazon analogy. Qureshi emphasised that Amazon delayed profitability for nearly 20 years to prioritize progress, but public markets nonetheless assigned it extraordinarily excessive earnings multiples.
“Amazon literally made no profit, no profit until basically about 20 years in as a business,” he stated. “In the year I think it was 2013… Amazon had a PE ratio… over 600 whereas today the PE ratio of Ethereum of course is something like 380.”
Because Ethereum’s P/S and P/E converge underneath his “fees = profit” assumption, Qureshi’s argument is that traders ought to evaluate ETH’s 300–380x a number of to Amazon’s P/E historical past, to not its a lot decrease P/S, if they’re going to use a single headline ratio in any respect.
The broader context, he pressured, is that Ethereum and different L1s are nonetheless in an exponential build-out part, extra akin to early web or e-commerce infrastructure than to late-cycle dividend payers.
Related Reading
“This technology has been getting bigger and bigger over time. It’s gobbling up the entire world of finance from where it started,” he stated, referencing his essay “In Defense of Exponentials.” “None of [these technologies] started printing a bunch of profit immediately in the first five or even 10 years.”
Despite uneven worth motion and underperformance of altcoins versus AI equities and gold, Qureshi stated his conviction within the long-dated Ethereum thesis has elevated, not weakened, by the general public debate.
“If anything, I have become more confident in my view,” he stated, including that nothing materials had modified within the final months to justify a serious portfolio rethink. “What exactly has changed in the last 2 months between, you know, ETH going to like $4,800 and ETH being at $3,000? The answer is basically nothing.”
Shared some post-debate reflections on my L1 debate with @santiagoroel, my rebuttal in opposition to the “crypto is all a big casino” doomers, and the place I believe we’re within the crypto macro cycle 👇 https://t.co/9uMJFuLVrX
— Haseeb ＞|＜ (@hosseeb) December 9, 2025
For Qureshi, a real repositioning would require a transparent invalidation of core assumptions—reminiscent of a quantum break of cryptography or a structural collapse in on-chain stablecoin demand. Short-term swings, in his view, are merely the pendulum of sentiment shifting round a still-fixed basic anchor.
His message to skeptics is that if markets tolerated Amazon at 600x earnings whereas it scaled right into a dominant platform, dismissing Ethereum at roughly 300–380x on a “too high on P/S” argument alone is analytically inconsistent.
At press time, ETH traded at $3,325.
Featured picture created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
