Jeff Park, Head of Alpha Strategies at Bitwise Asset Management, has gone on report to recommend that latest developments on the gold market may set off a mass exodus to Bitcoin. Notably, the Bank of England is underneath scrutiny for prolonged supply occasions on bodily gold, fueling renewed debate concerning the reliability of gold-backed property. As a response, Park writes<\/a> through X:<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m counting down the days until a logistical disaster (or outright fraud) in the physical delivery of these assets shatters the faith of even the most devout gold believers, driving them straight into Bitcoin\u2019s arms,\u201d Park wrote through X.<\/p>\n Park\u2019s assertion comes amid reviews that the Bank of England, which purportedly holds round 5,000 metric tonnes of gold, has delayed deliveries from what was once just a few days to four-to-eight weeks. According to a supply acquainted with the matter, \u201cThe wait to withdraw bullion stored in the Bank of England<\/a>\u2019s vaults has risen from a few days to between four and eight weeks,\u201d indicating that the central financial institution is \u201cstruggling to keep up with demand.\u201d<\/p>\n Market observers attribute these delays to an unprecedented surge in transatlantic shipments and rising gold inventories within the United States. \u201cPeople can\u2019t get their hands on gold because so much has been shipped to New York, and the rest is stuck in the queue,\u201d an business government informed reporters. The central financial institution\u2019s backlog has coincided with rising stockpiles on the Comex commodity alternate in New York, which has seen its gold stock rise practically 75%\u2014from 533 metric tonnes to 926 metric tonnes\u2014since November\u2019s US election.<\/p>\n Park additional underscored the business\u2019s historical past of logistical and fraud incidents by pointing to 2 notable scandals. He first talked about the Qingdao Metal Scandal. \u201cHere\u2019s the hilarious story called the Qingdao Metal Scandal,\u201d Park wrote. He recounted how merchants in China<\/a> reportedly used the identical stockpiles of copper, aluminum, and nickel as collateral a number of occasions, just for it to be revealed that a lot of the particular steel was lacking.<\/p>\n Park highlighted one other latest case with the London Metal Exchange (LME) Nickel Fiasco. \u201cThe LME found out that some of their nickel went missing! Instead of bags of the registered metals, bags of stones arrived. Even more shocking is that this is not LME\u2019s first nickel fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n More lately, Park referenced reviews that international commodities large Trafigura found a shortfall of $500 million price of gas in Mongolia. \u201cI already posted about this, but worth refreshing that Trafigura lost $500mm of fuel in Mongolia three months ago,\u201d Park wrote.<\/p>\n Such episodes, based on Park, illustrate the vulnerability of bodily commodity markets. \u201cYou can take the \u2018physical\u2019 fuel out of Mongolia,\u201d Park added, \u201cbut you can\u2019t take spiritual fuel of Genghis Khan out of Mongolia.\u201d<\/p>\n Advocates of digital property like Park argue that Bitcoin, typically touted as a \u2018hardest\u2019\u2019 asset on earth, sidesteps the logistical complexities that plague the bodily commodities sector. Yet, paradoxically, it nonetheless faces hurdles relating to regulatory acceptance and ETF buildings.<\/p>\n \u201cMeanwhile, the hardest asset on Earth [Bitcoin] can\u2019t even be contributed in-kind<\/a> to its own beloved Bitcoin ETFs, despite having near-zero logistics costs. But sure, let\u2019s keep pretending this system makes sense,\u201d Park remarked.<\/p>\n He went on to recommend that present regulatory frameworks stay a significant impediment: \u201cPart of why people are so worried about \u2018regulation\u2019 in crypto is because they keep putting the securities lens on the asset that doesn\u2019t actually work. Once you put the commodities lens on as the starting point, the world all of a sudden starts to make a LOT more sense.\u201d<\/p>\n While the Bank of England has not issued a proper assertion on the extended supply occasions, observers see this as one other potential wedge second for conventional gold buyers. If the backlogs persist, it may stoke additional skepticism concerning the reliability of bodily gold markets. Park and others within the crypto business see this as a turning level which will pivot consideration\u2014and capital\u2014towards Bitcoin, which doesn’t want bodily shipments or third-party vaults.<\/p>\n At press time, BTC traded at $95,961.<\/p>\n Featured picture created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\nBitcoin Over Gold<\/h2>\n
![\"Bitcoin](\"https:\/\/bitcoinist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/BTCUSDT_2025-02-13_09-25-26.png?resize=1024%2C473\")