Netflix has been served with cease-and-desist letters over its documentary, Biggest Heist Ever, which focuses on the multi-billion-dollar Bitcoin theft linked to Heather “Razzlekhan” Morgan and her husband, Ilya Lichtenstein. The letters, despatched by Morgan’s attorneys on Monday, accuse Netflix and manufacturing firm Library Films of defamation and privateness violations.
Netflix Cease and Desist Over Razzlekhan Bitcoin Heist
According to sources near the matter, Netflix has acquired complaints relating to alleged inaccuracies within the documentary’s portrayal of Heather Morgan and her involvement within the 2016 Bitfinex Bitcoin heist. Morgan’s attorneys assert that the movie falsely claims she and Lichtenstein bought stolen identification paperwork, together with passports and debit playing cards, on the darkish internet.
The authorized crew argues that these claims lack factual foundation and might have been disproven with minimal analysis. Public court docket data, they state, affirm Morgan was not concerned within the hack itself. Her attorneys emphasised that these misrepresentations injury her repute and perpetuate the misperception that she performed a main function within the theft.
The cease-and-desist letters additionally point out Morgan’s father-in-law, who was reportedly recognized as a hacker within the movie. Her attorneys labeled this assertion defamatory and with out supporting proof.
This Is A Developing Story, Please Check Back For More
Kelvin Munene Murithi
Kelvin is a distinguished author with experience in crypto and finance, holding a Bachelor’s diploma in Actuarial Science. Known for his incisive evaluation and insightful content material, he possesses a powerful command of English and excels in conducting thorough analysis and delivering well timed cryptocurrency market updates.
Disclaimer: The introduced content material might embrace the non-public opinion of the writer and is topic to market situation. Do your market analysis earlier than investing in cryptocurrencies. The writer or the publication doesn’t maintain any duty to your private monetary loss.
