The newest report by The Bitcoin Policy Institute goes for the bottom hanging fruit. It tries to persuade US politicians that “CBDCs will erode the distinction between America and authoritarianism,” which is true. To accomplish that, The Bitcoin Policy Institute appeals to the most affordable trick within the ebook: evaluating the US to China. The transfer is so loopy that it simply may work.
The controversy doesn’t finish there, The Bitcoin Policy Institute’s important proposal is that “The value of natively digital currencies for individual users can be fully realized with a combination of bitcoin and privately issued stablecoins.” That assertion won’t sit properly with bitcoin purists. Is the whitepaper capable of persuade the reader that this “combination of bitcoin and privately issued stablecoins” is a good suggestion?
Before judging, let’s learn the group’s reasoning.
The Bitcoin Policy Institute Plays The China Card
Let’s not beat across the bush, CBDCs are surveillance expertise. Programmable cash comes with potential issues and offers an excessive amount of energy to the issuer. To convey that concept, The Bitcoin Policy Institute paints an image of current-day China:
“Perhaps the most striking illustration of Chinese state power, however, has been the rapid development of its surveillance régime. Under President Xi Jinping, who ascended to the presidency in 2013, China has become the world’s leading market for surveillance technology.”
Then, the whitepaper describes what is understood concerning the Chinese CBDC challenge. Is it comparable or fully totally different from what they’re engaged on within the west?
“The People’s Bank of China, the country’s central bank, has been researching and developing a CBDC–the digital yuan, or e-CNY–since 2014. The digital yuan uses a state-run, private blockchain network to issue digital cash that is a direct liability of the Chinese central bank. This network records all transactions made with its native digital asset.”
Surprise! It’s virtually similar to what the Australian Central Bank is testing of their CBDC pilot challenge. It additionally confirms what the Australian report mentioned, “Central banks globally are actively exploring the potential role, benefits, risks, and other implications of CBDC.”
After that, The Bitcoin Policy Institute describes the mainstream media and “some American lawmakers” narrative across the subject. This is a generally held opinion on the state of affairs:
“It may be tempting, for some, to view the acceleration of U.S. government power through the lens of “global competitiveness.” For instance, the introduction of a CBDC by China has prompted concern by some American lawmakers that the U.S. is “falling behind” technologically.”
No, it’s not. The expertise simply doesn’t make sense except you admit to be an authoritarian regime. It’s so simple as that.
BTC worth chart for 09/28/2022 on Bitstamp | Source: BTC/USD on TradingView.com
CBDCs, The End Of Financial Privacy
Full KYC is mainly a given in high-level CBDC discussions, however to have official affirmation is extra convincing. To set the stage for this act, The Bitcoin Policy Institute quotes “a January 2022 white paper” through which “the Federal Reserve stated that a U.S. CBDC would need to be fully identity-verified.”
“Financial institutions in the United States are subject to robust rules that are designed to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism. A CBDC would need to be designed to comply with these rules. In practice, this would mean that a CBDC intermediary would need to verify the identity of a person accessing CBDC, just as banks and other financial institutions currently verify the identities of their customers.”
The reality of the matter is that “CBDCs provide governments with direct access to every transaction in that currency conducted by any individual anywhere in the world.” Even if it’s not marketed and even thought of within the unique model.
“Those calling for the rollout of a CBDC are naïve to believe that this can be done without establishing a centralized surveillance system for all financial transacting. Quite simply, even if such surveillance is not included in the V1 system design, it would be trivial to add it at a later stage. Once a door to surveillance is opened, it is virtually impossible to close.”
Simply put, CBDCs “represent an extension of this state control over economic life.”
The Stablecoins Angle
From a bitcoiner’s standpoint, the concept the world wants “a combination of bitcoin and privately issued stablecoins” is close to sacrilegious. Let’s learn The Bitcoin Policy Institute’s case for it:
“Both bitcoin and private stablecoins will enable instant, low-cost digital transacting both domestically and across borders. Digital dollars and stablecoins will continue to be subject to AML/KYC compliance by the platforms that facilitate transacting with them. In this currency ecosystem–which is with us already–the creation of CBDCs is, quite simply, unnecessary.”
That won’t persuade the bitcoiner, nevertheless it paints a transparent image for US politicians. And these are the doc’s target market.
The Bitcoin Policy Institute’s Closer
To shut the whitepaper off, The Bitcoin Policy Institute isn’t afraid to go right here:
“As the world goes the way of China in the 21st century, the United States should stand for something different: it should stand for freedom. For this reason, the United States should reject central bank digital currencies.”
Cheesiness apart, The Bitcoin Policy Institute is 100% proper on this one. CBDCs are a menace to society. Privacy is a human proper and monetary privateness is already restricted as it’s.
Featured Image by Lucas Sankey on Unsplash | Charts by TradingView
