The ongoing Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit could conclude with none adjustments to the $125 million judgment in opposition to Ripple, in accordance with legal professional Fred Rispoli.
The authorized knowledgeable advised that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could be ready for brand new management earlier than making a closing resolution. This has led to discussions about whether or not Ripple may negotiate a lowered penalty or various settlement.
Ripple vs. SEC Lawsuit Could End with $125M Judgment
The US SEC, at the moment led by a 2-1 pro-crypto fee beneath performing Chair Mark Uyeda, has not dropped its case in opposition to Ripple, regardless of withdrawing different cryptocurrency-related lawsuits. Legal analysts Fred Rispoli in an X post believes the company is ready for brand new SEC Chair candidate Paul Atkins to take workplace earlier than making additional selections on the case.
Fred Rispoli has argued that dropping the enchantment whereas preserving the $125 million positive would save the SEC from additional authorized battles.
“The best satisfaction of this, if true, is that it nullifies the thousands of hours of work put in by SEC staff to get the $125M judgment,” Rispoli acknowledged in a submit on X.
The Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit stays some of the advanced authorized battles in the cryptocurrency business. While the SEC lately closed instances in opposition to Kraken, Coinbase, and ConsenSys, it has but to take related motion in opposition to Ripple. Some authorized specialists consider the injunction on Ripple’s institutional gross sales of XRP could also be a key issue in the delay.
Speculation Over XRP Payments and Strategic Reserves
There has been hypothesis that Ripple could settle the $125 million fine by transferring XRP as a substitute of money. Vincent Van Code, a market analyst, advised that Ripple could be negotiating to pay the positive in XRP, which may then be allotted to a government-controlled cryptocurrency reserve.
According to Van Code, “Some are speculating that Ripple, rather than pay $125 million in dollars, provides the equivalent in XRP to the new crypto strategic reserve.” However, legal professional Rispoli doubts that such an association is probably going, given the gradual progress in authorized proceedings.
Meanwhile, Ripple’s escrow holdings, which include roughly 37.1 billion XRP, have been on the middle of discussions relating to potential authorities acquisitions. Over the weekend, U.S. President Donald Trump confirmed that XRP can be a part of the nation’s digital asset reserve, fueling hypothesis that Ripple’s escrow might be concerned in the authorized negotiations.
XRP Sales Restrictions Remain a Key Issue
The Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit has centered on whether or not XRP must be categorized as a safety. In 2023, Judge Analisa Torres dominated that Ripple’s institutional gross sales of XRP have been securities transactions, resulting in the $125 million positive. Ripple has since been working to problem the injunction that restricts sure gross sales of XRP to banks and cost processors.
According to authorized specialists, Ripple’s efforts to overturn the injunction might be a cause why the SEC has not but dropped its case. Attorney Jeremy Hogan has suggested that Ripple could also be participating with the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to contest the ruling.
Meanwhile, Ripple Chief Technology Officer (CTO) David Schwartz has dismissed issues about XRP inflation. Schwartz reaffirmed that XRP’s whole provide can’t be elevated beneath the XRP Ledger’s code.
“There is literally no function to create any more XRP. The code to do such a thing does not exist,” he acknowledged.
As for the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit, it’s at the moment beneath assessment on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The SEC submitted its arguments to the court docket on January 15, 2025, and Ripple has till April 16 to file its response.
Disclaimer: The introduced content material could embody the private opinion of the writer and is topic to market situation. Do your market analysis earlier than investing in cryptocurrencies. The writer or the publication doesn’t maintain any duty to your private monetary loss.